Over the past 15 years, a number of digital-only banks – neobanks – have grown at extraordinary pace, acquiring customers and expanding services across Europe. This growth has been underpinned by speed to market, rapid feature releases and flexible partnerships.
Dig a little deeper, however, and much of this success has been driven by decisions optimised for early momentum, rather than long term scale. For instance, neobanks have assembled a payments stack from multiple payment service providers (PSPs), foreign exchange (FX) providers, and scheme connections. This approach often felt like the most practical route forward, allowing teams to launch quickly and enter new markets fast. Flexibility – and speed of deployment – appeared outweigh everything else.
Over time, however, this scattered approach has revealed its limits. As transaction volumes increased and neobanks expanded into new markets, the number of integrations grew in tandem. What once felt agile quickly becomes a fragmented picture. Payments flow through different providers depending on geography, currency, or use case, creating a complex web of dependencies that has become increasingly difficult to manage.
Every new vendor introduced new operational overheads. Teams are tasked with maintaining multiple integrations, monitoring different service levels, and reconciling disparate data across systems that were not designed to work together. What begins as a technical challenge soon becomes an organisational one, absorbing time and resources from product, operations and compliance teams. Couple this with evolving regulatory demands across Europe, and the complexity becomes more than an inconvenience.
The good news is that this no longer has to be accepted as the cost of growth. Payments technology has matured, and scalable alternatives now exist that allow neobanks to simplify their stacks, reduce risk, and continue expanding without complexity increasing in parallel.